• Home
  • About
    • About
    • Management Team
    • Testimonials
    • News
    • Privacy and Terms
    • Useful Links
  • Services
    • Services
    • Asset Planning & Taxation Structures
    • Business & Taxation Accounting Services
    • Property Accounting Services
    • Property Tax Structures
    • Professional Trustee & Estate Planning Services
    • Taxation Consultancy & Advice
    • Property Procurement
  • Shop
  • Blog | Articles
    • Blog | Articles
    • All GRA Blogs
    • Articles by Matthew Gilligan
    • Articles by John Rowe
    • Articles by Janet Xuccoa
    • Client Updates
    • Video Blog
  • Free Resources
  • Seminars & Events
  • Newsletter
  • Request Interview
  • Contact
  • HOT SPECIALS
    • Free Accounting
    • Family Trust Check Up
    • Free Strategy Meeting
    • Real Estate Investar
    • New Year Special
BANKLINK CLIENT LOGIN (SECURE AREA)

client_login

UPDATES & NEWS FOR GRA CLIENTS

If you're our client, you can read important information, updates and news. 



Main Services
  • Asset Planning
    & Taxation Structures
  • Business & Taxation Accounting Services
  • Property Accounting
    Services
  • Property Tax Structures
  • Professional Trustee & Estate Planning Services
  • Taxation Consultancy
    & Advice
Other Services
  • Expats & Immigrants
  • Family Trusts
  • Insolvency
  • Property Investment
  • Property Procurement
  • LAQC
  • Aus & NZ Investors
Who Are You?

Who are you? A business owner, a property investor? If you are confused about how we can help click below to see our range of services organised to help you.



Video Blog

Watch video clips including news, information and tips all designed to help you reach your money goals.



Articles by Matthew Gilligan

WHAT DO THE BUDGET TAX CHANGES MEAN FOR PROPERTY INVESTORS?
Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Now that the dust has settled on what was one of the most anticipated budget announcements in recent memory, now is time to reflect on the impact of the announced and proposed changes on property investors.  In doing so I am going to focus on the specific impact of the tax changes and leave aside for the moment the wider macro effects of the impact of this budget on the economy.  Broadly speaking there are five areas where the tax changes will impact on property investors.  They are as follows:

  • The drop in personal marginal tax rates;
  • The removal of depreciation claims on buildings;
  • Proposed changes to the LAQC regime;
  • Raising GST to 15%;
  • Extra funding for audit activity at the IRD.

For advice on how the changes impact you contact us.

Depreciation vs Tax Cuts

Let’s take an example of a typical property investor that has taxable income from their job of $75,000 per annum and owns two rental properties that are currently worth circa $700,000 but were bought in 2002 and 2006 for $550,000.  For the 2011/12 income year if depreciation was still able to be claimed on buildings they would have been expecting to make a circa $6,800 depreciation claim which would have a maximum tax benefit of circa $2,200.  At the same time due to the cuts in personal tax rates there is an increase to their after tax income of circa $2,400.  Following this, the investor is $200 better off in the 2011/12 year.  It is also worth nothing that of course depreciation is usually claimed on a diminishing value basis so the amount that would have been claimed on the building moving forward would be reducing over time.  Finally, there is also the fact that in many instances depreciation claims produce a timing benefit only in that it is then recovered on sale.

Following this, we see the removal of depreciation claims as being mitigated by the drop in income tax rates (of course there will be additional private GST costs).

LAQC Regime

The budget announcement also signalled that there will be changes from the 2011/12 year to the LAQC regime.  At the moment the proposals are at issues paper stage only which means they are open for public submission until early July 2010.  The philosophy behind the proposed changes are to align the tax treatment of qualifying companies and loss attributing qualifying companies with limited partnerships.  This means that some of the same aspects that LAQCs have now will be retained in that tax losses will continue to be attributed to shareholders in proportion to their relative shareholding.  However, it also means a number of changes to other aspects of the LAQC regime.  It will mean that taxable profit is attributed to shareholders rather than taxed at company level and there is also a proposal to limit the amount of tax loss that can be claimed to the shareholders’ exposure in the investment. 

If you have an LAQC that may become tax profitable, then contact us for advice.

At this point in time the rules are not finalised but we will be watching this closely and it may well be that many investors who currently have properties in an LAQC will need to consider whether this is the appropriate structure for them moving forward. 

If you have an LAQC with property in it, contact us for advice on restructuring prior to the rules changing.

The fact that depreciation on buildings has been removed, which may lead to a decrease in the tax losses (or perhaps even some properties even becoming profitable), along with the proposed changes to the LAQC regime mean that a review of structures is necessary.  If the changes continue to proceed as proposed affected investors would be best placed to restructure prior to 1 April 2011.

If you are selling property and want to know about the impact of depreciation recovery then contact us.

Likewise if you are buying property and want to know if the LAQC is still the right structure then contact us.

The rise in the GST Rate & Audit Activity

The rise in the GST rate will not have a discernible effect on residential property investors other than expenses that they currently incur that attract GST will increase without the ability for the GST to be reclaimed.  There will be an impact on property traders and commercial property investors however.

If you are a property trader you need advice on transactions occurring around 1 October 2010 when the rate changes.  Please contact us for advice.

It is also worth noting that extra funding is going to be provided to the IRD with one of the focuses being the property industry.  As a result we encourage property investors to make sure that they are involving professionals in the preparation and filing of their tax returns and making sure that they are getting appropriate tax advice in relation to property transactions.

If you are concerned about tax treatment on past transactions or need advice on current ones, then contact us

Overview

Overall we think the budget was a largely positive one for property investors even in respect to the tax changes.  Certainly leading into the budget there was talk of ring fencing of losses, which has not come to fruition and would have had a much more significant impact on the property investment sector.  As it is the removal of depreciation claims on buildings from the 2011/12 year will definitely impact on property investors, but perhaps for property investors any impact of this will be matched by gains to the drop in personal tax rates.

Matthew Gilligan
Director


Learn More about Matthew

Contact Matthew at mg@gra.co.nz
or call +64 9 522 7955


P.S. Did you like this article? Go ahead and sign up to our free newsletter and receive tips, updates and useful information to help you protect your assets and grow your net worth.  GRA are accountants who provide expert accountant advice both in NZ and offshore.

 

Trackbacks (0) | Permalink
____________________________________________
Comment(0)   |   Bookmark and Share

Trackback Link
http://gra.co.nz/BlogRetrieve.aspx?BlogID=2309&PostID=86125&A=Trackback
Trackbacks
Post has no trackbacks.
Comments
Post has no comments.
Post a Comment




Captcha Image

Update: Tax Report & Risk-Free Rate of Return
Sunday, January 24, 2010

Dear Reader,

The tax report seems to reveal a concern/realization by the group that any tax change causing a significant drop in values in property, will be politically unacceptable. This was a view that I formed and I generally disregarded this option as too radical when I read and recently commented on the report HERE

But it is the government's actions and decision that counts.

Risk Free Rate OF Return

  • Rents non assessable, costs non deductible
  • Pay tax on equity ( not debt)
  • Tax payable irrespective of market going up or down
  • Tax payable despite asset not being sold - you have to find the tax out of cash flow
  • Leveraged investors relying on tax refunds to survive / get to break even cash flow, will go broke.
  • Westpac's estimation that house prices will drop 34% if this option comes in, is in line with Sweden’s experience where they ring fenced tax losses and house prices fell 35% and mass insolvency enveloped the nation.  The policy was reversed and the government thrown out at the next election. Sorry I don't know the year this happened. I am told that similar experiences have happened in Aussie with state taxes trailed targeting property.

Example Application Of RFRR Tax and Outcome

Here's an example scenario for little Joe Bloggs...

He has a rental property and earns $65k, has 2 kids and a spouse who works part time earning $15k. All household income is required to survive. The rental property is negative cashflow before tax refund $7,000, break-even cashflow post tax refund. The market value of the property is $400k, and the debt $350k. Currently Joe and his family get by - paying their living costs and mortgage payments (just). The market equilibrium assumes the tax refund and hundreds of thousands of Joe Bloggs' are doing this.

Enter this tax. Now Joe does not get a tax refund. He has to pay tax on 6% of $400k(mv)-$350k(debt)=$50k which is $3k times 33%, $1k tax. So previously he was getting $7k tax refund, now he pays $1k, he is $8k worse off.

The outcome is he has to sell in a market that is flooded with other Joes. He goes broke and is mortgagee sold. He stops spending and kicks off another recession with the thousands of other Joe Bloggs in the same predicament. They all vote labour for the rest of their lives and everyone blames National for the massive blunder. The next government throws out the unpopular tax, and the market reverts to where it was before...WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED IN SWEDEN WHEN THEY RING FENCED LOSSES.

Banking would also be destabilised and credit would stall again.

So this tax would cause huge loss in property values, hardship, destabilize banking, reduce consumption (credit will tighten and consumption drop), and kick off another recession....

I ignored it in my overview above as a clever idea that does not work in the real world. A cynic would observe that it makes the other options seem more palatable.

Also RFRR requires a lot of work for IRD, is subject to abuse (through manipulating valuations) and will stimulate heavy leveraging.

Example Of Potential Abuse Of the Tax

Example 1

1. Little Jonny owns a rental worth $300k with debt of $250k.

2. He pays RFRR tax on $300k-$250K=$50k times 6%*33%, $1k tax. 

3. Little Jonny's friend has a similar house, similar suburb.

4.  They sell each other their respective houses at $250k each, now 100% financed.

5. They achieve 100% financing by cross securing their respective investments to their homes, so they can borrow 100%. Valuers will now tend to view the market value of the houses as $250k, - cost.

5.  Now Little Jonny has zero tax to pay, under RFRR, $250k(MV)-$250K(debt)=$0 equity times 6%*33%=$0 tax - ie no tax.

Is this tax avoidance?  Probably, but the point is, the tax is open to abuse.

Example 2

1.  Little Jonny owns a rental worth $300k with debt of $250k.

2.  He pays RFRR tax on $300k-$250K=$50k times 6%*33%, $1k tax.

3.  Little Jonny's friend has a similar house, similar suburb.

4.  They sell each other their respective houses at $350k each, and loan each other $50k - now they are 100% financed and pay no equity tax.

There are a hundred permutations of ways to do this via Trusts etc. Is this tax avoidance?  Probably - but the point is again, that the tax is open to abuse.

I give Key and the Nats more credit than to bring in something this radical, this dangerous. They are pro-business and clever people - no question about that.

They understand that undermining consumption by destabilising banking, kicking off another recession and causing mass insolvency, is political suicide and not in the public interest. There is a better way in the other options of getting there (to a level playing field and weaning Kiwis off property investment – if that is what the Government wants), and the change needs to be more gradual.

Summary

Gilligan Rowe & Associates are 100% opposed to Risk Free Rate OF Return. We see it as a clever idea that does not work in New Zealand at this time. We don't believe the government will bring it in - we give them credit for being rational.

Someone might like to email this to Mr English or Mr Key if they agree with our thoughts, or create their own version. My advice is to please be respectful and constructive in what you send them.

Use the following email addresses:

bill.english@national.org.nz

john.key@national.org.nz


Matthew Gilligan
Director


Learn More about Matthew

Contact Matthew at mg@gra.co.nz
or call +64 9 522 7955


P.S. Did you like this article? Go ahead and sign up to our free newsletter and receive tips, updates and useful information to help you protect your assets and grow your net worth.  GRA are accountants who provide expert accountant advice both in NZ and offshore.

Trackbacks (0) | Permalink
____________________________________________
Comment(0)   |   Bookmark and Share

Trackback Link
http://gra.co.nz/BlogRetrieve.aspx?BlogID=2309&PostID=66875&A=Trackback
Trackbacks
Post has no trackbacks.
Comments
Post has no comments.
Post a Comment




Captcha Image

The Future of Tax in New Zealand
Thursday, December 03, 2009

In recent times the Tax Working Group reviewing New Zealand’s tax system has received increased attention. 

This is no surprise as it gets closer to making its recommendations, which now appear likely to come out early in the New Year.  The Tax Working Group is a collection of academic, government and industry tax professionals charged with reviewing New Zealand’s tax system. 

Part of their brief is to look at the equity and fairness of the system and look for ways to broaden the tax base, ideally so as to fund drops in the personal, trust and corporate tax rates. 

Many readers will be aware of some of the options they are considering in respect of the taxation of property including capital gains tax, a land tax and a tax focused on property investments (which imposes a deemed income based on a risk free rate of return).  My thoughts on this process are as follows: 

  • I expect to see individual marginal tax rates dropped, corporate and Trustee rates aligned, and the GST rate increased to pay for reduction in other rates;
  • While changing tax rates is high impact, don’t expect any radical changes to the taxation laws in the near future. EG Full blown capital gains taxes, or equity taxes, etc. The government has already gone out of its way to deny that it is interested in some of the proposals, particularly a capital gains tax.  Further, Bill English’s latest comments indicate there will be no radical changes in the 2010 budget announcement;
  • Furthermore the process involved in producing legislation to deal with the implementation of any relatively complicated new rules, such as the possible risk free rate of return tax on property investments, means that it would be some time before this comes into effect even if it were part of a budget announcement. So don’t expect rapid new changes to rules, but expect lots of options to be debated in an ongoing public review throughout 2010;
  • I expect the Tax Working Group to make a number of different proposals rather than give the government one preferred option.  This would allow the government to cherry pick elements of it that they wish to push further;
  • I do expect some changes to the tax system to be announced in the 2010 budget.  Property investment seems to be the obvious target at the moment and a change such as denying depreciation deductions on buildings would not surprise, though whether it would be retrospective is an interesting question;
  • I think the government will be lead by the results of a similar review that is currently being undertaken in Australia.  Look to the Henry review in Australia as an influencing factor on what is going to happen in New Zealand.
I believe the upshot of changes will be:-
    • Major reform will be signalled, but deferred pending further review by select committee and public reports;
    • Major changes to the way existing tax rules are used to fill the public purse will occur, and these changes are likely to include:-
      • Matching of the top marginal rates to the Trust and corporate rates, - the so called 30 – 30 - 30 option, with the top marginal rates and Trust and company rates set to the same peak rate, with a focus emerging on alignment to Australia;
      • In the medium term, a reduction of the corporate (and matching marginal rates and Trust rates) to match the Australian rates, currently 27% but likely to fall to 25%;
To pay for these changes:-
 
    • An increase in GST to 15% or thereabouts, - easy to roll out and administer so very likely;
    • ‘Rifle taxes’ focused on property, including looking at taxing capital gains through the front or back door ( eg: Taxing rental and commercial property gains, greater enforcement of existing rules and speculators cloaked as investors being attached more);
    • A focus on reduced public spending in all sectors, typical of any National Government, where the leaders come from a ‘spend thrift’ small and large business mindset, - trained in seeking economies and cost reduction, the very opposite of the Labour mob; 
Stamp Duty

I think that stamp duty should be considered.  It is progressive in nature (taxes volume) so satisfies the fairness and equity requirement.  It is also a system that is relatively easy to legislate for, hard to avoid, and easy to enforce.  I

If targeting the property sector and reducing the risks of a speculative bubble are a goal, then stamp duty on land transactions would also seem to achieve these goals. It dampens speculation (taking the margin off traders, leaving only the long term investors to prevail).

In the meantime we wait with baited breath as to what the next move is. Naturally GRA will keep you abreast of developments.  I

If we can help with advice with investments, structures or business planning, please contact us.


Matthew Gilligan
Director


Learn More about Matthew

Contact Matthew at mg@gra.co.nz
or call +64 9 522 7955


P.S. Did you like this article? Go ahead and sign up to our free newsletter and receive tips, updates and useful information to help you protect your assets and grow your net worth.  GRA are accountants who provide expert accountant advice both in NZ and offshore.

Trackbacks (0) | Permalink
____________________________________________
Comment(0)   |   Bookmark and Share

Trackback Link
http://gra.co.nz/BlogRetrieve.aspx?BlogID=2309&PostID=59294&A=Trackback
Trackbacks
Post has no trackbacks.
Comments
Post has no comments.
Post a Comment




Captcha Image


Previous 1 Next

Posts

  • WHAT DO THE BUDGET TAX CHANGES MEAN FOR PROPERTY INVESTORS?
  • Tax Changes & Market Update From Matthew Gilligan
  • Update: Tax Report & Risk-Free Rate of Return
  • NZ Tax Reform Report: Our Response
  • The Future of Tax in New Zealand
  • Are You A DINK?: Case Study
  • Proposed Changes to GST Regime
  • Rental Losses and Family Assistance
  • New Tainting Rules By Matthew Gilligan
  • Capital Gains Tax on its Way?

Tags

joint venture property Family Trusts spouses Tax Changes FBT associated persons rules bank loans Our Services - Real Estate Property Advice & Structuring business Property Investment Hawkins Clause tax IRD Chartered Accountants, Accountants, Reminders laqc saving investing bank loan structure property partnership structure interest rates business structures tainting relationship property property structures
  • associated persons rules (4)
  • bank loan structure (1)
  • bank loans (1)
  • business (1)
  • business structures (2)
  • Chartered Accountants, Accountants, Reminders (3)
  • Family Trusts (2)
  • FBT (1)
  • Hawkins Clause (1)
  • interest rates (1)
  • investing (4)
  • IRD (4)
  • joint venture property (2)
  • laqc (4)
  • Our Services - Real Estate Property Advice & Structuring (4)
  • Property Investment (10)
  • property partnership structure (3)
  • property structures (6)
  • relationship property (3)
  • saving (1)
  • spouses (2)
  • tainting (4)
  • tax (3)
  • Tax Changes (1)

Archive

  • June 2010 (1)
  • March 2010 (1)
  • January 2010 (2)
  • December 2009 (1)
  • November 2009 (2)
  • October 2009 (4)
Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape
MORE SERVICES FROM GRA




TAX CALCULATOR
  • Budget Comparison (Depreciation Impact)
  • Tax Comparison
  • 2011 Tax Calculator
  • 2012 Tax Calculator
Request aN INTERVIEW

Got a question or need help? Send us your details and we'll contact you.




Newsletter Sign Up

Get free updates, specials and tips designed to help you reach your money goals faster.
Title:
First Name *
Last Name *
Email *
Town/City

GRA Events

We've got seminars and workshops for property investors, business owners and in fact anyone interested in protecting their wealth and reaching their money goals.



Principal & Interest VS. Interest only loans Calculator

Enter your figures below* to have your Monthly Payment and Interest Calculated

Loan($) eg 250,000
Interest Rate 
Loan term eg 20

Monthly payment
Monthly interest


GRA T.V
Free Resources

We've assembled a bunch of useful stuff including videos to free reports, tips, ideas, downloadable tools and much more.



Accountants - Free Strategy
Accountants
Chartered Accountants
Discover More From GRA
Services  

LAQC
Family Trusts
Free Accounting
Property Accounting
Business Accountin
Family Trust Seminars
Free Resources
Video Blog
Seminars
Forum
Shop
Blog
Website Terms & Conditions
Family Trusts
Asset Planning
Estate Planning
Property Accounting
Tax Consultancy & Compliance
Business Accounting Services
Asset Protection
LAQC
New Immigrants
Foreign Investors
Accounting Firm
Expats & Immigrants
Accountants
Chartered Accountants
New Zealand Accountants
New Zealand Chartered Accountants

Privacy Policy & Terms of Trade | © Copyright 2009 Gilligan Rowe & Associates Ltd                  Website by OnCompany™ | www.on.co.nz