• Home
  • About
    • About
    • Management Team
    • Testimonials
    • News
    • Privacy and Terms
    • Useful Links
  • Services
    • Services
    • Asset Planning & Taxation Structures
    • Business & Taxation Accounting Services
    • Property Accounting Services
    • Property Tax Structures
    • Professional Trustee & Estate Planning Services
    • Taxation Consultancy & Advice
    • Property Procurement
  • Shop
  • Blog | Articles
    • Blog | Articles
    • All GRA Blogs
    • Articles by Matthew Gilligan
    • Articles by John Rowe
    • Articles by Janet Xuccoa
    • Client Updates
    • Video Blog
  • Free Resources
  • Seminars & Events
  • Newsletter
  • Request Interview
  • Contact
  • HOT SPECIALS
    • Free Accounting
    • Family Trust Check Up
    • Free Strategy Meeting
    • Real Estate Investar
    • New Year Special
item familytrust check up
BANKLINK CLIENT LOGIN (SECURE AREA)

client_login

UPDATES & NEWS FOR GRA CLIENTS

If you're our client, you can read important information, updates and news. 



Main Services
  • Asset Planning
    & Taxation Structures
  • Business & Taxation Accounting Services
  • Property Accounting
    Services
  • Property Tax Structures
  • Professional Trustee & Estate Planning Services
  • Taxation Consultancy
    & Advice
Other Services
  • Expats & Immigrants
  • Family Trusts
  • Insolvency
  • Property Investment
  • Property Procurement
  • LAQC
  • Aus & NZ Investors
Who Are You?

Who are you? A business owner, a property investor? If you are confused about how we can help click below to see our range of services organised to help you.



Video Blog

Watch video clips including news, information and tips all designed to help you reach your money goals.



Articles by Matthew Gilligan

WHAT DO THE BUDGET TAX CHANGES MEAN FOR PROPERTY INVESTORS?
Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Now that the dust has settled on what was one of the most anticipated budget announcements in recent memory, now is time to reflect on the impact of the announced and proposed changes on property investors.  In doing so I am going to focus on the specific impact of the tax changes and leave aside for the moment the wider macro effects of the impact of this budget on the economy.  Broadly speaking there are five areas where the tax changes will impact on property investors.  They are as follows:

  • The drop in personal marginal tax rates;
  • The removal of depreciation claims on buildings;
  • Proposed changes to the LAQC regime;
  • Raising GST to 15%;
  • Extra funding for audit activity at the IRD.

For advice on how the changes impact you contact us.

Depreciation vs Tax Cuts

Let’s take an example of a typical property investor that has taxable income from their job of $75,000 per annum and owns two rental properties that are currently worth circa $700,000 but were bought in 2002 and 2006 for $550,000.  For the 2011/12 income year if depreciation was still able to be claimed on buildings they would have been expecting to make a circa $6,800 depreciation claim which would have a maximum tax benefit of circa $2,200.  At the same time due to the cuts in personal tax rates there is an increase to their after tax income of circa $2,400.  Following this, the investor is $200 better off in the 2011/12 year.  It is also worth nothing that of course depreciation is usually claimed on a diminishing value basis so the amount that would have been claimed on the building moving forward would be reducing over time.  Finally, there is also the fact that in many instances depreciation claims produce a timing benefit only in that it is then recovered on sale.

Following this, we see the removal of depreciation claims as being mitigated by the drop in income tax rates (of course there will be additional private GST costs).

LAQC Regime

The budget announcement also signalled that there will be changes from the 2011/12 year to the LAQC regime.  At the moment the proposals are at issues paper stage only which means they are open for public submission until early July 2010.  The philosophy behind the proposed changes are to align the tax treatment of qualifying companies and loss attributing qualifying companies with limited partnerships.  This means that some of the same aspects that LAQCs have now will be retained in that tax losses will continue to be attributed to shareholders in proportion to their relative shareholding.  However, it also means a number of changes to other aspects of the LAQC regime.  It will mean that taxable profit is attributed to shareholders rather than taxed at company level and there is also a proposal to limit the amount of tax loss that can be claimed to the shareholders’ exposure in the investment. 

If you have an LAQC that may become tax profitable, then contact us for advice.

At this point in time the rules are not finalised but we will be watching this closely and it may well be that many investors who currently have properties in an LAQC will need to consider whether this is the appropriate structure for them moving forward. 

If you have an LAQC with property in it, contact us for advice on restructuring prior to the rules changing.

The fact that depreciation on buildings has been removed, which may lead to a decrease in the tax losses (or perhaps even some properties even becoming profitable), along with the proposed changes to the LAQC regime mean that a review of structures is necessary.  If the changes continue to proceed as proposed affected investors would be best placed to restructure prior to 1 April 2011.

If you are selling property and want to know about the impact of depreciation recovery then contact us.

Likewise if you are buying property and want to know if the LAQC is still the right structure then contact us.

The rise in the GST Rate & Audit Activity

The rise in the GST rate will not have a discernible effect on residential property investors other than expenses that they currently incur that attract GST will increase without the ability for the GST to be reclaimed.  There will be an impact on property traders and commercial property investors however.

If you are a property trader you need advice on transactions occurring around 1 October 2010 when the rate changes.  Please contact us for advice.

It is also worth noting that extra funding is going to be provided to the IRD with one of the focuses being the property industry.  As a result we encourage property investors to make sure that they are involving professionals in the preparation and filing of their tax returns and making sure that they are getting appropriate tax advice in relation to property transactions.

If you are concerned about tax treatment on past transactions or need advice on current ones, then contact us

Overview

Overall we think the budget was a largely positive one for property investors even in respect to the tax changes.  Certainly leading into the budget there was talk of ring fencing of losses, which has not come to fruition and would have had a much more significant impact on the property investment sector.  As it is the removal of depreciation claims on buildings from the 2011/12 year will definitely impact on property investors, but perhaps for property investors any impact of this will be matched by gains to the drop in personal tax rates.

Matthew Gilligan
Director


Learn More about Matthew

Contact Matthew at mg@gra.co.nz
or call +64 9 522 7955


P.S. Did you like this article? Go ahead and sign up to our free newsletter and receive tips, updates and useful information to help you protect your assets and grow your net worth.  GRA are accountants who provide expert accountant advice both in NZ and offshore.

 

Trackbacks (0) | Permalink
____________________________________________
Comment(0)   |   Bookmark and Share

Trackback Link
http://gra.co.nz/BlogRetrieve.aspx?BlogID=2309&PostID=86125&A=Trackback
Trackbacks
Post has no trackbacks.
Comments
Post has no comments.
Post a Comment




Captcha Image

THE TAXATION OF LAND TRANSACTIONS: WARNING!
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
Warning To Solicitors, Accountants and Trustees/Trust Advisors...

BEWARE THE APPOINTOR IN NEW ASSOCIATED PERSONS RULES

(11 August 2009)

While the Finance and Expenditure Select Committee managed to weed out much of the over-reach of the new associated persons definition there still appears to be a glaring problem in relation to the Trust to Appointor test in section YB 11.

In the Official’s Report to the Finance and Expenditure Committee on submissions on the bill, the Committee was made aware of the potential for s YB 11, when coupled with the tripartite test, to lead to otherwise unrelated Trusts being associated when professional advisors are nominated as Appointors. This valid concern was raised by Tomlinson Paull and whilst accepted by the Committee, not enough has been done to prevent the undesirable outcome of otherwise unrelated entities from being associated to each other.


As background, this is about association rules between dealers in land, developers or builders and other entities in the business of buying and holding property that are ‘related’ by the associated persons rules. The concern is that if associated, an entity buying property to hold will be taxable on capital gains on properties sold within ten years of acquisition, if at time of acquisition the buy to hold entity was associated to a dealer, developer or builder.

The rules are changing and are much wider than they were, introducing the prospect of:-

  • Tainting professionals ( and their private assets) if they act as appointors or hold an equivalent power; and
  • Tainting other client’s assets inadvertently through such association. This raises the potential for negligence, and the prospect of uncertainty in enforcement.
Tainting Detail

Section YB 11 in the new Taxation Remedial bill associates Trustees of a Trust with the person or people who hold the power to appoint and remove Trustees. In short, a Trust is associated with its Appointors. The tripartite test at s YB 14 associates two parties where there is a common associate of both provided that the common associate is not associated to the two parties under the same rule.

For this reason, if a professional holds the Power of Appointorship in respect of a Trust (being Trust “A”) and then holds the Power of Appointorship in a second Trust (Trust “B”), there will not be association between the two Trusts under the tripartite provision as the common associate (being the advisor) is associated to both Trust A and B under the same test.

The Select Committee held this limitation out as being the reason why there would not be unintended Trust to Trust association. Whilst it is true this will prevent an advisor who holds this power in respect of multiple Trusts from creating inadvertent association between the Trusts, the door is still left wide open for there to be association on a far wider scale than surely could have been intended.

To explain further, consider the situation where an advisor accepts a role as Appointor in relation to a Trust that is going to buy an investment property. The Appointor is related to the Trust under s YB 11. The same Appointor might also own shares in a development company, perhaps be Settlor of a second Trust (otherwise unrelated to the first) that is involved in property development or might even be deemed to hold shares in a company involved in development under s YB 3.

What this demonstrates is that there is a raft of other provisions that might associate otherwise unrelated Trusts or companies to the Appointor then leading to association between these other entities and the first Trust under s YB 14. This is obviously not a problem that is fixed by the exclusion of not being able to apply the same rule twice in s YB 14.

Negligence Prospect

Of course reading this you might say that the advisor in that instance would be negligent in accepting the role of Appointor given that they should be aware that they are associated to a development company, and you may be right. What taxes could arise from this on other client’s assets as a result of this oversight?

Thirty percent of capital gains in the next ten years, on assets acquired during the period of association would be an approximation of the answer. However, there might be situations that arise where the advisor has less control over the matter.

Whilst uncommon it is not completely unheard of for an advisor to be a “back up” Appointor in respect of a Trust when the original Appointors die. Or what if a client decides to start trading / developing / building property in their Trust that you are appointor in and does not tell you ? Or what if IRD deem such activity to have existed ?

Summary

It seems clear to us that this is a flaw in the associated persons provisions that was quite rightly raised before the Select Committee but their proposed solution does not work.

The moral of the story clearly is to be careful whom you nominate as an Appointor in respect of your Trusts both now and in the future. It can lead to unwanted consequences. 

A brief background on the new associated persons rule changes (if you are interested) is here.

Remember these blog articles address the general public and are therefore simplified in the blog for the intended reader.

If you would like help with understanding how this affects you, or have a question, we are here to help.  You can Request a Free Interview or use our Ask the Experts service.

Until next time,


 

Matthew Gilligan
Director

Learn More about Matthew

Contact Matthew at mg@gra.co.nz or call +64 9 522 7955

P.S. Did you like this article? Go ahead and sign up to our free newsletter and receive tips, updates and useful information to help you protect your assets and grow your net worth.  GRA are accountants who provide expert accountant advice both in NZ and offshore.



Trackbacks (0) | Permalink
____________________________________________
Comment(0)   |   Bookmark and Share

Trackback Link
http://gra.co.nz/BlogRetrieve.aspx?BlogID=2309&PostID=45981&A=Trackback
Trackbacks
Post has no trackbacks.
Comments
Post has no comments.
Post a Comment




Captcha Image

Supreme Court Awards Spouse 40 percent Of Inherited Property
Tuesday, July 21, 2009

In case you missed it over the weekend, the NZ Herald article on a woman being awarded a share of her husband's 'inherited property' that pre-existed the relationship rewrote some relationship property rules.

What Happened?

The supreme court held that a woman whom helped maintain an inherited farm property (that pre-existed the marriage) was entitled to 40% of the growth on the property that occurred during the relationship.

Why?

Because she contributed to the maintenance of the house by performing domestic chores and by earning income.

Why is this a change ?

It was generally accepted before this case that inherited property that pre-existed a marriage is separate relationship property and not subject to 50/50 split on divorce.

Comment;

  • Personally I think the case is fair, - she did contribute to the relationship so why should it not be shared property, given she contributed to the properties upkeep? The plaintiff's counsel noted the farm would have likely been forced to be sold, but for her income being used to support bank payments.

  •  If you wish to avoid this happening, - put your property in a Trust and ask your spouse to sign a relationship property agreement. The latter ( relationship property agreement or S21 agreement) makes it very clear that the property is not intended to be joint relationship property. Such agreement is much easier than an expensive fight later on, and perhaps easier to put in place earlier than later.

  •  The Trust is a great thing to do before the relationship commences, but is weakened as a defence to a claim if setup during the marriage and the property is transferred during the relationship. If you wish to do this during the marriage, the S21 agreement is essential to stop spouses 'tracing' their potential relationship property interest into the Trust.

Thank you,

 

 Matthew Gilligan
Director

Learn More about Matthew

Contact Matthew at mg@gra.co.nz or call +64 9 522 7955

P.S. Did you like this article? Go ahead and sign up to our free newsletter and receive tips, updates and useful information to help you protect your assets and grow your net worth.  GRA are accountants who provide expert accountant advice both in NZ and offshore.

 

 

Trackbacks (0) | Permalink
____________________________________________
Comment(0)   |   Bookmark and Share

Trackback Link
http://gra.co.nz/BlogRetrieve.aspx?BlogID=2309&PostID=43431&A=Trackback
Trackbacks
Post has no trackbacks.
Comments
Post has no comments.
Post a Comment




Captcha Image


Previous 1 Next

Posts

  • WHAT DO THE BUDGET TAX CHANGES MEAN FOR PROPERTY INVESTORS?
  • Tax Changes & Market Update From Matthew Gilligan
  • Update: Tax Report & Risk-Free Rate of Return
  • NZ Tax Reform Report: Our Response
  • The Future of Tax in New Zealand
  • Are You A DINK?: Case Study
  • Proposed Changes to GST Regime
  • Rental Losses and Family Assistance
  • New Tainting Rules By Matthew Gilligan
  • Capital Gains Tax on its Way?

Tags

Tax Changes Family Trusts relationship property FBT business structures joint venture property saving laqc property partnership structure tax business Hawkins Clause property structures Our Services - Real Estate Property Advice & Structuring Property Investment investing Chartered Accountants, Accountants, Reminders bank loans interest rates associated persons rules bank loan structure tainting IRD spouses
  • associated persons rules (4)
  • bank loan structure (1)
  • bank loans (1)
  • business (1)
  • business structures (2)
  • Chartered Accountants, Accountants, Reminders (3)
  • Family Trusts (2)
  • FBT (1)
  • Hawkins Clause (1)
  • interest rates (1)
  • investing (4)
  • IRD (4)
  • joint venture property (2)
  • laqc (4)
  • Our Services - Real Estate Property Advice & Structuring (4)
  • Property Investment (10)
  • property partnership structure (3)
  • property structures (6)
  • relationship property (3)
  • saving (1)
  • spouses (2)
  • tainting (4)
  • tax (3)
  • Tax Changes (1)

Archive

  • June 2010 (1)
  • March 2010 (1)
  • January 2010 (2)
  • December 2009 (1)
  • November 2009 (2)
  • October 2009 (4)
Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape
MORE SERVICES FROM GRA




TAX CALCULATOR
  • Budget Comparison (Depreciation Impact)
  • Tax Comparison
  • 2011 Tax Calculator
  • 2012 Tax Calculator
Request aN INTERVIEW

Got a question or need help? Send us your details and we'll contact you.




Newsletter Sign Up

Get free updates, specials and tips designed to help you reach your money goals faster.
Title:
First Name *
Last Name *
Email *
Town/City

GRA Events

We've got seminars and workshops for property investors, business owners and in fact anyone interested in protecting their wealth and reaching their money goals.



Principal & Interest VS. Interest only loans Calculator

Enter your figures below* to have your Monthly Payment and Interest Calculated

Loan($) eg 250,000
Interest Rate 
Loan term eg 20

Monthly payment
Monthly interest


GRA T.V
Free Resources

We've assembled a bunch of useful stuff including videos to free reports, tips, ideas, downloadable tools and much more.



Accountants - Free Strategy
Accountants
Chartered Accountants
Discover More From GRA
Services  

LAQC
Family Trusts
Free Accounting
Property Accounting
Business Accountin
Family Trust Seminars
Free Resources
Video Blog
Seminars
Forum
Shop
Blog
Website Terms & Conditions
Family Trusts
Asset Planning
Estate Planning
Property Accounting
Tax Consultancy & Compliance
Business Accounting Services
Asset Protection
LAQC
New Immigrants
Foreign Investors
Accounting Firm
Expats & Immigrants
Accountants
Chartered Accountants
New Zealand Accountants
New Zealand Chartered Accountants

Privacy Policy & Terms of Trade | © Copyright 2009 Gilligan Rowe & Associates Ltd                  Website by OnCompany™ | www.on.co.nz